Growing Up Sexually The
Sexual Curriculum (Oct., 2002) [to
Volume II
Index] [to
Main
Index Page] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [I] [II] [III] [IV] Janssen, D. F. (Oct., 2002). Growing Up Sexually. Volume II: The Sexual Curriculum: The Manufacture and Performance of Pre-Adult Sexualities. Interim Report. Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2 [previous chapter]
[next chapter] Sexologising Childhood.
Historical
Antecedents
of "Developmental Sexology"
"[…]
and I never got the peaches!"[1] "B'li
yadaim, b'li yadaim"[2] Summary: This chapter identifies selected
historical antecedents of contemporary sexological conceptualisations of the
child, with a reference to ethnographic import. First, it is argued that "developmental
sexologies" or ontologies are cultural constructs that describe and legitimise
given curricular operationalisation efforts. It is suggested that the theme of
age salience in early sexology is neglected by historians. Specifically,
masturbation evolved from a poorly curricularised pathology discourse (until
1850s) to one that seemed to be based solely on phase ideologies (1905 to late
1960s). A breakthrough in developmental sexology was established by Von
Krafft-Ebing's considering all
prepubertal sexual phenomena as "paradoxic" to nature, a pathology not fully
eradicated until the 1930s. Slowly, pathology gave way to a stress on early
sexuality as "play" and "experimentation", as illustrated by the ethnographic
notes of Tessmann. This seemed to have been arrived at by the transitional
recognition of "love" development. It
was argued that the influx of non-western data, single authors excepted, was
markedly delayed past key theoretical efforts (Freud); the systematic, and later numeric,
cross-cultural approach is still in its infancy, a surprising fact regarding
the wide interest in cross-cultural sexology today. Highlights are briefly
summarised.
Contents [up] Sexologising
Childhood. Historical Antecedents of "Developmental
Sexology" 2.0 Introduction [up]
[Contents] 2.1 The
"Developmental Sexology" of Cultures: The Vicarious Theme of Curricularism [up] [Contents] 2.2 The Masturbation Paradigm:
"Onanopathies" and the Relevance of Age [up] [Contents] 2.3
Paradoxia Sexualis: Shifting Discourses Surrounding the Sexologised Child [up]
[Contents] 2.4 Themes of Rehearsal and Play:
Limited Historical Notes [up] [Contents] 2.5 Savage Childhood and Precocity:
Early to Modern Observations [up] [Contents] 2.5.1
Anthropology and Play Sex: Günther Tessmann [up] [Contents] 2.8 Summarising Notes [up]
[Contents] 2.0 Introduction [up] [Contents]
"For those born
and educated after the year 2000, we will be their history, and they will be mystified
by our self-imposed, moralistic ignorance of the principles of sexual and
erotic development in childhood"[3].
Only a few authors have contributed to this
history of attitudes concerning pre-"mature" sexuality as a science or
construct besides touching on the history of masturbatory regulation of
children. A full review and bibliography of relevant contributions being
available elsewhere[4], I would
like in following paragraphs examine man's shifting ethnographic, folkloristic and
clinical notions of growing up sexually, for the occasion of this limited
discussion divided in subchapters covering the doctor's ideas (age stratified
concepts of "cheiromanic" pathology (§2.2);
and the historical employment of medicalising attitudes toward sexual behaviour
timing (§2.3), the "own-backyard"
attitude (the historical concepts of sexual curricula including "play" and
"rehearsal" phases (§2.4), the
"other-side-of-the-fence" dimension (the use and neglect of anthropological
data by early sexologists (§2.5), the nascent
cross-culturalist approach, (§2.6), and the
culturalist moral / utilitarian context (§2.7). The basic argument explored here is the
basic undercurrent motivating discourses as they take their form within their
respective historical setting. This undercurrent is hypothesised to be
represented by the political tradition curricularising trajectories of change,
that is, operationalising pathways of differentiation by culturally legitimised
agendas. In less abstract terms, the field of erotic possibilities, which is
notoriously large in homo sapiens sapiens, is governed by a social grid
organising chronology and direction of events. This view has not been
outstanding in today's sexological heritage. There is a definite historical
process here addressed as the academic sexologisation of prepuberty, as
evidenced by countings of numeric studies on my behalf [see results
in pdf]. Leaving methodological problems associated with this finding
for what they are, it would be more interesting to take a brief look at this
sexological heritage before continuing the task of situating ourselves
conceptually within postmodern sexological realism.
2.1 The
"Developmental Sexology" of
Cultures: The Vicarious Theme of Curricularism [up] [Contents]
A rarely explored dimension in
curricular concepts of sexuality is that of the culturally ingrained hesitation
to utilise developmental approaches, and to address developmental issues, at all. Psychodynamic theory, of course, established a radical
centralisation of psychosexual phases as a human psychology and pathopsychology.
Before Money's claim to phrases such as "paediatric sexology", earlier thoughts
only vaguely resemble such initiatives, originating as they did from a
stereotypical medical dichotomy[5].
Early curricularising theories about the sexual development of man sought to
have sex start at puberty[6].
Early American, French and Italian sexology, however fragmentary and
unsystematically, integrated earliness in the pathological spectrum of
sexuality. Narrative at first ranged from moralistic though inconsequential
(Acton, Maudsley) to romantic (Mantegazza). Later, German but also French and
English authors began using the child as an illustration of hypothetical
biomedical models of pathology (Cullerre, Féré), but hesitated to regard the
child as a clue to normal developmental models (Bell, Ellis, Scott). An illuminating
example, the work of Hermann Rohleder demonstrates a definite evolution taking
the reader from of the justification of pathologising to discussions of
possible biological mechanisms of normality, which ultimately become
phase-identifying. In 1921[7] Rohleder unfolds a developmental theory consisting of a 3-stage erotisation of the brain by inner
secretions, apparently equal to that of Kohl (1911)[8]. The curriculum thus reads: till 8 [or 10] an absolute ignorance
(unconscious sexuality, like "gewisse Koketterie kleiner Mädchen" and
exhibitionism; some Onanie might be physiologically conscious), then till 12 a
stadium in-between unconsciousness and consciousness ("ein stadium der
Ahnungen, d. h. die Empfindungen werden deutlicher aber noch nicht ganz
deutlich"[9]) and finally a full consciousness of function and social purpose.
2.2 The Masturbation Paradigm: "Onanopathies" and the Relevance of Age [up] [Contents]
The early history of masturbation is well-studied[10].
Masturbation historians only rarely addressed the issue of absolute and relative
age and its possible implications for sexual behaviour curriculum ideologies.
Elia (1987), for instance, hardly reveals a clue to curricularised attitudes to
masturbation. Rousseau's attitude toward masturbation was both complex and
ambiguous (Lejeune, 1974)[11].
Tissot's arguments were specific to the pedagogical implications of
masturbation, but these are rarely addressed. First, there is the occasional emphasis on
spermatorrhoea which could not have been valuable in childhood masturbation,
though little is known about early medical appraisal of ejacularche (see
however Schoondermark, 1902:p26-7)[12].
Second, numerous references to "youth" can be found as early as the 17th
century, meaning everything from children to young men (e.g. Kett, 1971:p285)[13]. Masturbation in childhood and youth was covered by
Schetsche and Schmidt (1996)[14],
who distinguish four stages in the pedagogical concept of masturbation (p14-5).
First (17th century), the "child" had to be taught that it was sexual; later,
it had to be taught that it was immoral; still later, it was to be controlled
as an urge; and finally (latter half 18th cent.) it could not be mentioned
unless in a mystified manner. As Flandrin (1976:p280-3)[15]
points out, the first theologist known to express concern for the carnal sins
of children was Jean de Gerson (1363-1429), praeses of the Parisian University.
Until the 18th century, there would have been silence on the matter. Unlike
during the French Enlightenment, in the last quarter of the 18th century, it
was said that German authors "extended" the then established risk group to
include toddlers and even babies (Mortier and Colen, 1995:p834)[16].
By the 19th century, Rosenberg (1973:p136-7)[17]
argues, "[n]ot even the youngest child could be presumed immune; one physician
noted that even infants of eighteen months had been taught the "horrid
practice" [note]. Perhaps the instances of "furious masturbation" which had
been observed in such infants demonstrated the power of this instinct; but the
very strength of this animal attribute only underlined the need for controlling
it"[18]. The first article
known to cover specifically children (young girls) is probably Zimmerman (1779)[19].
By the middle of the 19th century, masturbation by "little" children was
apparently something of an issue in medical Europe as judged by articles by Van
Bambeke (1859)[20] and Behrend
(1860)[21],
and later by Fleischmann (1878)[22].
In 1841, puberty ("Het intreden der jongelingschap") was seen as a "natural"
cause of masturbation, as was the frequently mentioned case of "very young
sinners" afflicted by "[a] weak, tender morbid condition of the body" [23].
In 1854, it was recommended that "[i]l ne faut pas que
l'on ignore que ce sont souvent de très jeunes enfants qui se livrent avec
fureur à l'onanisme"[24]. By that time, paediatricians were well aware of their
involvement in the case[25].
Before this period it is suggested that masturbation was battled with little
respect for age, but focussed on adolescents. In 1861, Debay[26]
reported that genitals before age 8 "restent muets", whereas in "adolescence"
(ages 8-14), thus, preceding "puberty" (15-21), masturbation might occur. However, "les désirs ne se ferairent pas encore sentir si des jeunes gens
ou des adolescents instruit par les premiers ne faisaient naître ces désirs et
n'anticipaient sur l'ordre naturel". Masturbation
was covered by most German-language paediatric Lehrbuchs (Steiner, Biedert, Vogel, Von Heubner, Unger, Henoch,
Neumann, etc.), perhaps more regularly than in early non-German paediatrics. Steiner ([1873:p335])[27]: "Wat betreft den
leeftijd, waarop deze ondeugd gepleegd wordt, heb ik mij meermalen overtuigd,
dat het eerste begin dikwijl reeds bij zeer kleine kinderen, van een à twee
jaar, wordt waargenomen"; he further refers to one Marjolin claiming sexual
phenomena at the breast (Steiner seems to describe an infantile orgasm). By the beginning of the 20th century it was generally
known that "[i]n man at the age of puberty the sexual emotion awakes powerfully,
while active social life opens before the young man with all its exigencies"[28].
Freud (1905, 1912)[29]
described three phases of masturbation, and pathologised persistence into
adulthood (cf. Szasz, 1970 [1972:p233-4][30]).
Stanley Hall and Havelock Ellis mentioned masturbation in the light of
adolescent age social immaturity, a theme extending well into the 1960s.
Freudian curricularisation of masturbation was followed by most psychoanalysts
well into the second half of the 20th century, though with a variable degree of
freedom and alterations[31]. Concluding, it can be argued that the concept of
phase-specific nosologising and denosologising was gradually introduced into
the well established masturbation discourse. Phases were not initially of much
relevance, and even later used only as a mere expansion of the patient
population. In the late 19th century it evolves as an (at least in part)
specifically paediatric discourse,
and in the early 20th century it is effectively transplanted into the pedagogical realm, as a purely
curricular concept and concern.
2.3 Paradoxia Sexualis:
Shifting Discourses Surrounding the Sexologised
Child [up] [Contents]
In a previous project[32],
I have provided an examination of early (1877-1931) German-language clinical
sexologists' usage of narrative and scientific rationale in conceptualising
prepubertal sexuality. Basic arguments presented in this overview included (1) the
principle of bio-othering of the child within the sexological realm in
the course of potentialising puberty as a "libidarchic" (nascent libidinous,
awakening) storm; and (2) the pre-1930 principles of nosologising the moral delineation of curricular categories in
human sexology. I aimed to challenge archaic endocrinological arguments as
forming a leading undercurrent in the curricular concept of early sexuality
most strikingly embodied by Von Krafft-Ebings' paradoxia sexualis category, an a priori pathological
interpretation of sexual expressions preceding puberty. Further, I aimed to
explore the shifting balance of endocrinological, neurological and pedagogical
concepts and narratives in the definition of sexuality as they pertain to the
differentiation of moral categories associated with the timing problem in
sexology. It was clearly demonstrated that Von
Krafft-Ebing lacked most of an "Ellisian" concept of the sexual life span, and
sought to explain earliness in terms of degeneration, and neuropathic
deterioration. Contrary to former authors, Freud's infantile sexuality was
discussed in a tone of voice that could be designated "dispassionate,
disinterested, and strikingly secular and amoral"[33].
It is also apparent how authors furiously rejected by Freud, particularly Moll
and later Stekel, chose a developmental approach that can be called progressive
or at least multidisciplinary and modernist. Freud himself referred to Ellis,
but never adopted his progressive developmental perspective. Rather, Freud
merely utilised his peculiar bi/triphasic model as a tool for discussing adult
psychopathology. 2.4 Themes
of Rehearsal and Play:
Limited Historical Notes [up] [Contents]
One function of
studying children's "play", as Mergen (1975:p400)[34] argues, lies in "[…] the understanding it
provides of the development of the social sciences and their impact through schools
and other institutions. The problem then becomes, not what children actually
did, but what adult students of children's play thought they were doing. By
looking closely at the origins of the academic studies of children's play, it
is possible to show the relation of these studies to other intellectual and
social concerns and then make some observations on the connections between play
and culture". Early German medical sexology has
discussed sexual expressions before puberty rather extensively (Janssen, 2001)[35],
but few authors seemed inclined to discuss the matter in positive terms of
function or value. Schrenk-Notzing (1895:p35)[36],
for instance, suggested that, since "playing "pappa and mamma" or "being
engaged" may attain pathological significance", the children should be observed
at play, "to ascertain whether they there give evidence of sexual excitement,
and whether the manner of play corresponds with the sex". If so indicated,
"energetic treatment should begin immediately, if possible under the direction
of a physician educated in psychology, and capable of the employment of
suggestion" (cf. p51-3, 73). Langfeldt
(1981:p109-10)[37] pointed to the "worship" of childhood sexuality in 1410, discussed by
Beccadelli (1908)[38] and in European folk tales. However, only a few references to childhood
sexual behaviours are made in early documents (see Stone, 1977:p510). These
include play at copulation of French sheep herding boys and girls, and early
17th century eight-year-olds ("Instead of sticking little sticks up their
[rectums] as children do, pretending to give each other enemas, he lustly
screwed them without knowing what he was doing")[39]. A painting by Coypel (ca 1770) entitled Kindliche Spiele might or might not be considered "erotic" by his
contemparies[40]. Another drawing by Fragonard with the same title[41], may prove less dubious. References collected by Van Ussel
(1967:p150-3/ 1968 [1971:p171-3]) suggested to the author that until the end of
the 18th century children indeed "played sexually" freely until about age
seven, and in a lesser degree so until puberty. "In the moral and pedagogical
literature of the first half of the 18th century, we find no restrictions
against […] pre-pubertal sexual expressions; in the second half of this century
it appears that a repressive trend sets in such as, up to then had never been
witnessed". At the closing of the 18th century, Réstif de la Bretonne[42] names a game called "Little Wolf", which was claimed to be five
centuries old, and quite innocent, had it not been for occasional adolescents'
participation. Kellogg (1881) names "sham
marriages" and "imitating the "Black Crook" ". Havelock Ellis ([1936, I:p36-7])[43]
was one of the prominent to speculate on the rehearsive aspect of early sexual
behaviour. He (1901)[44]
also presented some of the very first normative
sexual histories in clinical literature since Von Krafft-Ebings' work with
the sexual anamnesis in the 1870s. The autobiographical approach was also noted
in the homosexual discourse (Hirschfeld). Ellis writes: "A kind of rudimentary
sexual intercourse between children, as Bloch has remarked [[45]],
occurs in many parts of the world, and is recognized by their elders as play.
This is, for instance, the case among the Bawenda of the Transvaal [[46]],
and among the Papuans of Kaiser-Wilhelms-Land, with the approval of the
parents, although much reticence is observed [[47]].
[…] "Playing at pa and ma" is indeed extremely common among children in genuine
innocence, and with a complete absence of viciousness; and is by no means confined
to children of low social class. […] [These games] are of the nature of play,
in so far as play is a preparation for the activities of later life, though,
unlike the games, they are not felt as play". Stressing the normative (unlike Bloch),
Ellis refers to Groos, who as one of the first posited the concept of
preparatory "love play", drawing a parallel between animal and human phenomena[48].
Probably, "love games" among children were commonly known at the turn of the
century. Chaimberlain (1896:p200)[49]
stated: "The numerous love games, which Mr. Newell [[50]]
and Miss Gomme [[51]] enumerate,
such as "Knights of Spain", "Three kings", "Here comes a Duke a-roving",
"Thread, thread the Green Grass", "I'll give to you a Paper of Prins", "There
she stands a lovely Creature", "Green Grow the Rushes, O!", "The Widow with
Daughters to marry", "Philander's March", "Marriage", etc., corresponding to
many others all over the globe, evidence the social instincts of childhood as
well as the imitative tendencies of youth"[52].
In a series of 83 games collected in Washington, D.C., by Babcock (1888)[53],
thirty were "love games"[54].
In the Gomme collection, 30 were "Courtship and Lovemaking Games"
apart from 29 "Marriage Games" (1898, II:p461-2). A milestone work was
presented by Bell (1902)[55].
The paper provides a range of heterosocial games thought to provide occasion
for kissing and hugging, illustrated by many cases, including "love
demonstrations" lasting into adulthood and intergenerational crushes.
Critically, "[l]ove between children of the opposite sex bears much the same
relation to that between adults as the flower does to the fruit, and has about
as little physical sexuality in it as an apple-blossom has of the apple that
develops from it" (p333)[56].
Was it only after Freud that love games could be discussed as sex games or were
they indeed platonic? In Anthropophyteia,
Adler (1911)[57] lists nine
"typical" "erotic" games of childhood. The alternative hypothesis reads that
Victorian children indeed played "love" more typically than they played "sex".
Later work also mentions "love tokens"[58]
but skips the sex; these authors preferred to study school environments, but
apparently missed or (did not find) the positive evidences of heterosexuality
found in numerous studies in the 1980s through 1990s (see Appendix III). Moll (1898, I:p44-5; 1908
[1912:p101-2])[59] discussed Groos'
rehearsal paradigm in extenso, yet with precaution. Speaking of coital
movements in animals, he argued: "The
view that in such cases the movements are imitative merely is untenable, for
young animals which have never had any opportunity of watching the physical
manifestations of love in older ones, will nevertheless themselves exhibit such
manifestations. At most it remains open to dispute whether in these cases it is
still permissible to speak of love-games, as do Groos and others, or whether we
should not rather speak simply of manifestations of the activity of the sexual
impulse. But the dispute does not involve differences of opinion regarding
matters of fact; it is purely terminological. For, in the first place, Groos
himself, who regards the games of childhood as a form of training, suitable to
the nature of the individual, for its subsequent activities, recognises that
games are sexually differentiated. He believes that we have to do, not, as some
think, with imitative processes, but with preliminary practice, subserving the
purposes of self-development; and he considers that girls naturally turn to
games adapted to train them for their subsequent profession of motherhood,
whilst boys incline to games corresponding to their predestined activity as
men. Even if we accept this theory of Groos, we are compelled to recognise a
sexual element in the games of youthful animals. In addition, however, we must
note the fact that Groos gives a wider extension to the concept of play than
other writers, and that he regards as love-games processes which others might
perhaps describe as sexual manifestations. According to Groos, caressing
contact is to be regarded as playful when, in the serious intercourse between
the sexes, such contact appears to be merely a preliminary activity rather than
an end in itself. Here two cases are possible: in one the carrying out of the
instinctive activity to its real end is prevented by incapacity or by
ignorance; in the other, it is prevented by a deliberate exercise of will. The
former occurs in children; the latter, often enough in adults. Whatever view we
hold regarding this matter, the sexually differentiated love-games of young
animals must be regarded as a manifestation of the sexual life". Still, Moll ([1912:p174]) only hesitantly argued that
mere imitation, like playing house, or playing "prostitution" may not be signs
of a Paradoxic urge. Gradually, early sex as play, or even as game, came to be
accepted as a routine narrative. Neologist John Money is especially known for
his explorations[60] in
naturalising the concept within a comparative (combined ethnographic and
zoologist) localisation. Money's
"sexual rehearsal play" theme surfaced in a 1970 article[61],
although his human "coital play" was mentioned before in the 1960s. Despite this lobbying, most "complete" discussions on
children's play never include sexual elements (e.g., Hartley and Goldenson,
1957:p102)[62]. 2.5 Savage
Childhood and Precocity:
Early to Modernist Observations [up] [Contents]
The precocity of the savage child was
frequently noted by early sexologists (Bloch, 1902[63],
II:p254; Margold, 1926:p644-5; Crawley[64],
1929:p11-2, 13-4; Guyon[65],
1929:p64; Pedrals, 1950:p16-8; Edwardes and Masters, 1961:p80; Ellis, ([1936,
I:p36-7]). Coital licence as well as
sexual urges started early in many pre-industrial settings, reviewers argued
(e.g., Ploß and Bartels [1918, I:p146, 187-8][66];
Ploß [1912, II:p519-53][67];
Karsch-Haak, 1911)[68].
The anthropological implications for sexual development theories could only be
discussed in pathological terms by pre-1900 writers (an exception seems to be
Ostrowsky cited by Buch, 1882:p45)[69].
For instance, Hammond[70]
remarked that he observed public intercourse among 3 to 4-year-olds in New York
as well as in New Mexico, while also citing similar observations by Godard in
Cairo, in his case of proving a causal relationship between early sexual excess
and impotence. Forel[71]
argued that in some tribes an "unbelievable" spontaneous sexual urge exists
among 7 and 8-year-olds, based on a
hereditary Satyriasis or Nymphomania. Ploß took a wholly moral attitude,
along with a largely indirect approach to the problem, in a (long) chapter on
"Kindheit und Keuschheit. Das Beispiel der
Erwachsenen"[72]. Ploß and Bartels (ibid.) conclude that "even in children
the urge, which we would judge to be a great vice, is satisfied at liberty, but
for them is mere "play". Boys and girls have intercourse with each other in
manners, though naïve, we abhor even when encountered in adults" (transl. DJ).
Buschan ([1921:p248]; 1927, II:p82)[73]
discussed the matter in a matter-of-fact attitude ("Naturalia non sunt
turpia"), as did Von Reitzenstein (1931:p191)[74],
Crawley (1929:p13), Kinsey et al. (1953:p108)[75],
and Erikson (1950 [1963:p86])[76]
visualising coital practices as "primarily playful imitation". 2.5.1 Anthropology and Play Sex: Günther Tessmann [up] [Contents]
The nascent anthropological recognition
of play sexuality is nicely illustrated by the notes of Günther Tessmann.
In 1911[77],
he addresses the issue of emics and etics when discussing Pangwe (Africa) children's
sexual excursions: "Ich schicke voraus, daß ich einiges, was die Pangwe selbst noch als Spiel
betrachten, nicht erwähne, weil es nach meiner auffassung in andere Gebiete der
Volkskunde gehört, so z.B. rechne ich die Vorversuche zum Geschlechtlichen verkehr,
die allerdings vielfach im Anschluß an "Spiele", besonders an das
"Familiespielen", statthaben, nicht zu den Spielen, obgleich die Pangwe sie mir
unter dem Namen [eboba'ne-bo'ngo] als richtiges "Spiel" aufzählten, ferner
nicht Handlungen und Beschäftigungen, die einen ersten Zweck im Auge haben.
Freilich ist hier die Grenze sehr schwer zu ziehen, da man sich darüber
streiten kann, was wirklich "ernstiger Zweck" und was nur "spielerische
Betätigung" ist". He (Tessmann, 1911:p250;
Tessmann, 1913, II:p252-3)[78] notes how children begin to imitate parental life with
ages 5 and 6, and "mit 8-9 Jahren ist das "Elternspielen" schon nichts weiter
als ein zielbewußter Geschlechtsverkehr, bleibt aber in der allgemeinen
Auffassung ein Spiel, das mir unter [zwei Namen] direckt unter "Kinderspielen"
aufgeführt wurde […]". Later Tessmann (1921
[1998:p151-2][79]; 1934a,
[I]:p226-7)[80] observed
that Baifa boyhood sexual life
develops in two stages: one, as in the Pangwe, of general promiscuity ("Bei den
Baifa heißen diese geschlechtlichen Vorübungen tepampam te b[o]bte"), and one of passive homosexuality
with older brothers, at age 5 or 6 onwards. When puberty approaches, the father
would warn the daughter: "Jetzt ist das "tepampam"
zu Ende!". Other tribes in East-Cameroon
were covered by Tessmann (1928)[81]
on his 1913/1914 field work. Among the Mbum
(p336), "zwischen Kindern beiderlei Geschlechts bis etwa zu sieben Jahren
kommen mehr spielerische Versuche zum Geschlechtsverkehr vor und zwar wie bei
den Pangwe und anderen Negern auch, beim "Familienspiel", und zwar im Busch
oder, während der Abwesentheit der Eltern, in den Häusern". Having
become so much accustomed to these "Spielereien", Tessmann (1934b, I:p204)[82]
notes his inability to observe the
"Mann-und-Frau-Spiel" in Baja
children. 2.6 The
History of Cross-Cultural Research of Developmental Sexuality: A Short
Appraisal [up] [Contents]
A full review
being offered elsewhere[83],
a brief characterisation of the "ethnographic" concept of psychosexual
development seems to be in place. Freud never studied children via a direct
approach, and, apart from fragmentary remarks, did not instrumentalise his
theories with ethnographic data. This is hardly surprising given the
fragmentary nature before 1905, or even before Freud's death. Apart from
incidental authors such as Margold and Guyon, and many pseudoacademic
cross-cultural inventory efforts, a 1945 work by Ford, four decades after the proposition
of Freudian psychosexual theory addressed shortly the beginnings of
"reproductive life". Most authors in the 1950-1970 era examined psychoanalytic
formulations mostly by using Whiting and Child's data, who themselves wrestled
with the charisma of Freudianism. The cross-cultural approach regarding
sexual "restraint" issues (associated with the SCCS ratings) ended somewhere
around the middle of the 1980s, when the ethnological approach to childhood
sexuality matters was fairly well established. The work by Ford and Beach
(1951) still provides the most comprehensive descriptive data collection, even
though it is fragmentary and lacks a sound theoretical or hypothetical
perspective, as did subsequent authors for over half a century. From the middle
of the 1980s onward, and particularly in the 1990s, Anglo-American sociologists
have employed an intriguing "ethnographic" mode of researching playground
sexualities[84]. This has
sensitised the concept of "sexual cultures" as well as the
cultural/"culturalist" and "cross-culturalist" entry. 2.7 Shifting Narratives and Uses in
Exocultural Developmental Sexology: The Moral Index [up] [Contents]
To
expand on the discussion of 20th century academic agenda (§1.2), a general outline can be
made for the moral and ethical overtures involved in non-endocultural developmental
sexology. As argued, pre-1900 ethnographic observations on sexual upbringing
were infrequent and accusatory (§2.5).
Instances were to support the general negativist thesis on savage's
promiscuity, and lack of moral standards. A changing spectrum was announced by
the influx of Freudianist projects of the 1920s (Malinowski, Mead, Róheim; cf. §1.2.1). Ethnographic works, at
times augmented by personalist input, were frequently used in bitter complaints
at the address of so-addressed "Western" sexual discourse (Guyon[85];
e.g., Atlas, Africa; Introduction). Kinsey's [et al.] use of ethnologia was biased to
demonstrate the precocious (notably 1953:p108n8) and thus to counterbalance (oppose) "Western" discourse. Levine[86]
notes: "Kinsey repeatedly implied that the sexual customs of the West were
unique, or nearly so, and based wholly on arbitrary assumptions. His vague
references to anthropological data were highly selective. In his eyes, "the
reactions of our social organization to the various types of behavior are the
things that need study". Kinsey declared that mores originated neither in
accumulated experience nor in scientific examination and objectively gathered
data. The sociologist and the anthropologist find the origins of such customs
in ignorance and superstition, and in the attempts of every group to set itself
apart from its neighbors" ". As for a different contextualism, O'Carroll[87]
legitimised his use of Ford and Beach in "righting the balance" of noncoverage
by mass media. Brongersma's use of ethnology and history in a way typical of
much of the fragmentary "movement" culture facilitated his life-long critique
of hegemonic representation of what he phrases "boy-love", in a project to
emancipate the male homo-ehebophilic "type" from other configurations in the
age/gender field. The attempt lacks a theoretical basis, though. In this
advocatist context, it is often argued that "strong emotional barriers still
have to be broken down in the large majority of people before the attitudes and
norms of society can be changed to the point where it is generally realised
that children really do have sexual organs responding to lust, and that the
sexual excitement of a child does not always come from outside, but arises from
the child's inner self"[88].
Mark that the original 1986 Danish work was edited by what called itself the " "Trobriands"
Collective of Authors". Certainly, the
sparks of "advocatist" movement never accomplished a sustainable academic
cultural-historical assembly (as did the "gay" identified movement)[89].
The contribution for the anthropological cause, therefore, remains limited. Illustratively
for writings in the 1970s and early 1980s, Malinowski's work was partially
reprinted in a pamphlet entitled "Kindliche
Sexualität bei Naturvölkern" in a German project signed "Archiv Antiautoritäre
Erziehung" (1978). By the late seventies, Yates (1978)
begins her "cultural" chapter, which entails a juxtaposition of Irish Inis Beag
with Polynesian Mangaia, with a lamentation on "our culture": "Austere and frightening, the concept of sex
as a necessary evil and abstinence as Christ-like remains basic to Christianity
and to our culture". Her exposé, we are to believe, is a challenge of "the most
erotically barren" place on earth with "erotic Eden", representing "our" choice
between "minimization" and "constriction" on the one hand, and "promotion" of
sexual "development" on the other. Straver's (1986) interactionist
interpretation of Ribal's (1973) colloquia within a juxtaposition format of
Scandinavian and U.S. narratives, had, as I have argued (§1.1.3.1),
implicitly normalised Scandinavian and criticised American trajectories. More
Americans have voiced their interpretation of contemporary American discourses
as "anti-sexualist" (§3.1.2.1;
North America), yet without much of a cross-cultural
claim. The SCCS studies reversed original negative (1970s) to
positive (1984) scales of "restraint" (§s 3.0.2, 7.1.1) after a long tradition of
discussing "permissiveness" among cross-culturalists. Lloyd DeMause,
recycling 1970 statements in the 1990s, utilised a
particularly brutal use of ethnomisic and anti-anthropologist narrative in
reducing history and all culture to abuse and "incest" categories (e.g., Atlas, Middle East; etc.); this effort appears illustrative
in the selective and ethnocentric revival of Freudian and anti-Freudian
narrative. Few studies if any, however,
justify "Western" universality claims regarding traumatogenetic trajectories in
cases of subculturally or culturally endemic "illegal" practices (chs. 14 and 9).
Officially, it can be argued, there is a striking though not perfect uniformity
of legislative curriculum among contemporary "Western" nations (Graupner), the
minor differences not adequately legitimisable. The subgenre concerned with
"historical" and "cross-cultural" "backgrounds" to
"abuse" in the 1980s and 1990s has had little effect on this
curriculum. 2.8 Summarising
Notes [up] [Contents]
Considering the preceding chapter, the
following arguments can be made: (1) Except for a seemingly expansive
mode of including children in masturbation nosologies based on orgasmogenic
principles, there was hardly any formal (e.g., clinical) concept of children's
sexuality before such end-1900 authors as Groos, Moll, Hall, Ellis et al. (§2.4). At any rate, curricularisation was not an
apparent issue in the work of early masturbation theorists, although it would generally be operationalised as a
pedagogical matter even before 1800 (Vogel); (2) Until 1930, and lateral of
the growing tolerance for psychodynamic perspectives, a considerable amount of
clinicians reiterated Krafft-Ebingian pathologising of prepubertal timing of
sexual phenomena, regarding it literally "paradoxic" to (at least) nature (§2.3); (3) Modern operationalisations
of prepubertal sex as "play", "imitation" and "experimentation" diffusely arose
in late 19th century authors, before Freud (§2.2).
In a minor degree, this seemed to be legitimised (Ellis) or merely identified
(Ploß / Bartels) through the ethnographic case; another reference was the
zoological (Groos). The rehearsal/play paradigm was first tested within the
"love" game context, steadily gained popularity with the application to genital
behaviour, and was later integrated in ethno/zoologically informed theoretical
models by Money and others; (4) From the 1920s onward, a
growing number of sexologists included ethnographic data to legitimise "play"
and "rehearse" operationalisations of prepubertal sexuality, where formerly
ethnographers (e.g., Ploß et al.) utilised an altogether moralist approach
coupled with pathofysiological claims. The utilisation of anthropological data
shifted from blatant moralism to apologies of liberalism (Guyon), and the
presumed consequences of such cultural contextualities (Reich). Here, for the
first time, Malinowski challenged Freudian motives for curricularisation,
particularly latency, on the basis of non-Western data; this was frequently
used by authors in the second half of the 20th century (preparatory surveying). (5)
Apart from incidental authors, systematic cross-cultural inventory efforts
seemed to have started with 1945 work by Ford, four decades after the
proposition of Freudian psychosexual theory. Since, there have been some
numeric elaborations, utilised for especially psychodynamic theoremata, but
hardly for descriptive or theoretical efforts. Particular neglect is noted for
the issue of curricularisation of sexual behaviour trajectories. Notes [up] [Contents]
[last
updated] [1] Morrison et al. (1980:p20) [2] "Without hands, without hands". Father,
quoted by Spiro (1958 [1975:p221]) [3]
Money, J. (1987) Introduction, in Sandfort, Th., Boys on their Contact with Men. Elmhurst, NY: Global Academic
Publishers [4]
Janssen, D. F. (July, 2001) Paradoxia
Sexualis: The Bio-Othering and Psychopathia Sexualis of the Child. Unpublished manuscript [bibliography] [5]
Moses (1922) Kostitution und Erlebnis in
der Sexualpsychologie und -pathologie des Kindesalters, Zeitschr f Sexualwiss 8,10:305-19; Friedjung, J. K. (1931) Die Physiologie
und Pathologie der kindlichen Sexualität, Monatschr
f Kinderheilk 51:343-58; Gött, T. (1931) Physiologie und Pathologie der
Sexualität, Monatschr f Kinderheilk
51:321-42 [6]
Scott (1900) noticed 7 stages of sexual
development, of which the first prepubertal four were Ten Lunar, infancy,
childhood, and boy-/girlhood. Sexually, they were all "expressive of a passive
existence, which, to all intents and purposes, is neuter" (p478). Well aware of
climate and familial factors, he states that "[b]efore puberty, the boy is
normally entirely free from all sexual thoughts or impressions" (p51); the girl
is not different. Bell is able to categorise "five more or less well marked
stages" in love development, the first two of whom range from ages 3 to 8, and
8 to 14. The paper however circumvents the issue of sexual instinct: hugging
and kissing pleasure "is not specifically sexual except in some cases which I
am inclined to consider as precocious". [7]
Rohleder, H. (1921) Sexualpsychologie.
Monographien zur Sexualwissenschaft 2.
Hamburg: P. Hartung, p24-9 [8] Kohl, Au. (1911) Pubertät
und Sexualität. Würzburg: Stuber, p22-31 [9]
Basing on his sexological experiences and the comments of parents, a sign
diagnostic of transition from stage I to II is the child starting to look at
adult's genitalia rather than other children's. In phase II wise parents should
consult the family practitioner to
sexually educate the child at least
as much to prevent him from masturbatory manipulations! [10]
For a brief outline of historical investigation, consider the following (full
references are found elsewhere): Von Gagern (1952); Spitz (1952); Hare (1962);
Duffy (1963); Jacobs (1963); Comfort (1967); MacDonald (1967); Ussel, van
(1967/68); Szasz (1970); Cade (1973); Gilbert (1975); Neuman (1975); Pilgrim
(1975); Buda (1976); Renshaw (1976); Bullough and Bullough (1977:ch.5);
Greydanus & Geller (1980); Egelhardt (1981); Carter (1983); Hudson (1983);
Chromy (1984); Money (1985); Stengers & Neck,van (1984); Elia (1987); Bloch
(1989); Okada (1989); Hall (1992), Kay (1992); Lüthehaus (1992); Duche (1994);
Schroth (1994); Braun (1995); Mortier et al. (1995); Richter (1996); Hunt
(1998). Also Spree, R. (1986) Sozialisationsnormen in ärztlichen Ratgebern zur
Säuglings- und Kleinkindpflege, in Martin, J. & Nitschke, Au. (Eds.) Zur Sozialgeschichte der Kindheit.
München: Verlag K. Alber, p609-59, see p628-9, 641-3; Van Ussel, J. (1968)
"Vuile manieren" en seksuele opvoeding, Persoon
& Gemeenschap [Dutch] 21,3:137-47 [11] Lejeune, Ph. (1974) Le "dangereux supplement": lecture
d'un aveu de Rousseau, Annales:
Economies, Sociétés, Civilisations [France] 29,4:1009-22 [12]
Schoondermarck, J. Jr. (1902) Het (Auto-
en Mutueel-) Onaneeren [etc.]. Amsterdam: Moransard [Dutch] [13]
Kett, J. F. (1971) Adolescence and
Youth in Nineteenth-Century America, J
Interdiscipl Hist 2,2:283-98. Reprinted in Rabb, Th. K. & Rotberg, R.
R. (Eds., 1976) The Family in History. New York: Octagon Books, p95-110 [14]
Schetsche, M. & Schmidt, R. (1996) Ein "dunkler Drang aus dem Leibe": Deutungen
kindlicher Onanie seit dem 18. Jahrhundert, Ztschr
Sexualforsch 9,1:1-22 [15]
Flandrin, J. (1976) Späte Heirat und Sexualleben, in Bloch, M. et al. (Eds.) Schrift und Materie der Geschichte. Frankfurt
am Main: Suhrkamp. Cited by Schetsche and Schmidt (1996:p2), op.cit. [16]
Mortier, F. & Colen, W. (1995) Inner-scientific reconstructions in the
discourse on masturbation (1960-1950), Paedagog
Hist [Belgium] 30,3:817-47 [17]
Rosenberg, Ch. E. (1973) Sexuality, Class
and Role in 19th-Century America, Am
Quart 25,2:131-53 [18]
A comparable case is presented by Gillis (1996) who examined the early
development of writings on infant and childhood thumb-sucking in American
paediatric textbooks since 1878. He discusses the integration and consolidation
of this suctus voluptibilis into
common American paediatric coverage by observing that it found pathological and
nosological anchors [p65] in its being classified as a "functional neurological
disease". The parent, nurse and
non-paediatric physicians were incapacitated in their potential expertise, and
the habit was pathologised by its association with orofacial deformity and
sexualised [thus, pathologised] by its association with masturbation. The
paediatrician was considered a coloniser
rather than the self-declared explorer
of the unknown terrain of infancy [p73] and paediatrics was identified as "an
early intellectual example of contextual or relative "truth"[p64]", by virtue
of its anchoring the child's behaviour in its adults consequences. See Gillis,
J. (1996) Bad habits and pernicious results: thumb sucking and the discipline
of late-nineteenth century paediatrics, Med
Hist 40:55-73 [19]
Zimmerman (1779) Warnung an Eltern, Erzieher und Kinderfreunde wegen der
Selbstbefleckung, zumal bey ganz jungen Mädchen, Neues Mag f Ärzte 1,1:43-51 [20] Van Bambeke, C. (1859) Note sur certaines habitudes
vicieuses chez les très-jeunes enfants, Bull
Soc Méd Gand 25 :7-14 [21]
Behrend, F. J. (1860) Über die Reizung der Geschlechtsteile, besonders über
Onanie bei ganz kleinen Kindern, und die dagegen anzuwendenden Mittel, J Kinderkrankh 35:321-9 [22]
Fleischmann, L. (1878) Ueber Onanie und Masturbation bei Säuglingen, Wien Med Presse 19:8-10, 46-8. See also
Carter (1983:p190-1) [23]
Vering, A. M. (1841) Pastorale
Geneeskunde. Almelo [Holland]: J. T. Sommer. Dutch transl. from the German,
p164-84 [24] Rilliet, F. & Bartez, E. (1854) Traité Clinique et Practique des Maladies des Enfants. Vol.
III. 2nd ed. Paris: Baillière, p417 [25]
E.g., Bednař, A. (1856) Lehrbuch der
Kinderkrankheiten. Vienna, p352 [26] Debay, Au. ([1961]) Hygiene
et Physiologie du Marriage. 27th ed. Paris, p95-7 [27]
Steiner, J. ([1873]) Compendium der
Kinderziekten [etc]. Arnhem [Holland], Dutch transl. of German orig. [28] Marro, A. (1899) Influence of the puberal development
upon the moral charcter of children of both sexes, Am J Sociol 5,2:193-219, at p214 [29]
Freud, S. (1905) Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie. Freud, S. (1912) Zur
Einleitung der Onanie-Diskussion. In Die Onanie.
Vierzehn Beiträge zu einer Diskussion der "Wiener Psychoanalytischen
Vereinigung" (Diskussionen der Wiener psychoanalytischen Vereinigung,
Heft 2). Wiesbaden; G.W., Bd. 8,
p332-45 [30]
Szasz, Th. (1970) The Manufacture of
Madness. New York [etc.]: Harper & Row. 1972 Dutch transl. [31]
E.g., Premsela, B. (1947) Sexuologie in
de Praktijk. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Strengholt, p212 [Dutch] [32]
Paradoxia Sexualis, op.cit. [33]
Carter, C. (1983) Infantile hysteria and infantile masturbation in late 19th
century German language medical literature, Med
Hist 27:186-96, at p196 [34]
Mergen, B. (1975) The Discovery of Children's Play, Am Quart 27,4:399-420 [35] Paradoxia
Sexualis, op.cit. [36]
Schrenk-Notzing, A. von ([1895]) The Use
of Hypnosis in Psychopathia Sexualis. 1956 Engl. Transl. from German orig.
New York: Institute for Research in Hypnosis Publication Society [37]
Langfeldt, Th. (1981) Sexual development in children, in Cook, M. &
Howells, K. (Eds.) Adult Sexual Interest
in Children. New York: Academic Press, p99-120 [38]
Beccadelli, A. (1908) Hermaphroditus.
Leipzig [Privatdruck]. See also contributions by Forberg and Kind [39] Bouchard, G. (1972) Le
Village Immobile [etc.]. Paris, p325. "L'un et l'autre sexe est bien très
enclin à l'amour, j'ai été étonné de voir cette passion se développer de bonne
heure, au point que des garçons, même de sept ans à huit ans, ont commerce avec
des filles de leur âge". Quoted from Tessier (1776:p70) [40]
See Fuchs, R. ([ca. 1928]) Geschichte der
Erotischen Kunst. Vol. 2. München: Albert Langen [41]
See Karwath, C. von (1908) Der Erotik in
der Kunst. Vienna: Stern [42] De la Bretonne, R. (1794-7) M. Nicolas ou le Coeur Humain Dévoilé. 1985
Dutch transl., De Liefdesavonturen van
Mons. Nicolas […]. See p7-39 [43]
Ellis, H. (1936) Studies in the
Psychology of Sex. New York: Random House. 2 vols. [44]
Ellis, H. (1901) The development of the sexual instinct, Alienist & Neurologist 22,3:500-21 [45]
Bloch, op.cit. [46] Ztschr
Ethnol 4 (1896):[p364] [47] Ztschr
Ethnol 1 (1889):[p16] [48]
Groos is known because of Freud's reference in 1905. See Groos, K. (1896) Die Spiele der Thiere. Jena: G. Fischer;
(1899) Die Spiele der Menschen. Jena:
G. Fischer, especially p326-33 [49]
Chaimberlain, A. F. (1896) The Child and
Childhood in Folk-Thought. New York [etc.]: Macmillan [50]
Newell, W. W. (1883) Games and Songs of
American Children. New York: Harper, p39-62 [51]
Gomme, A. B. (1894-8) The International
Games of England, Scotland and Ireland [etc.]. 2 Vols. London: David Nutt [52]
More plays by Gomme include "Here comes Three Dukes a-Riding", and "Poor Mary
sits a-Weeping" (cf. Chaimberlain, p270-1). [53]
Ref. Bell (1902:p339). Babcock, W. H. (1888) Games of Washington children, Am Anthropol 1:243-84. Reprinted in
Sutton-Smith, B. (Ed.) A Children's Games
Anthology. New York: Arno Press. See also Lippincott's Magazine, March and September, 1886 [54] Short references to "love games" in
Schwartzman, H. B. (1976) The
Anthropological Study of Children's Play, Ann
Rev Anthropol 5:289-328, at p293; Mergen, B. (1975) The Discovery of
Children's Play, Am Quart 27,4:399-420,
at p401 [55]
Bell, S. (1902) A preliminary study of the emotion of love between the sexes, Am J Psychol 13,3:325-54. Another
interesting article in this respect is Just (1897) Die Liebe im Kindesalter, Prax Erziehungskunde 11, and Speyer, R.
(1904) Die Liebe bei den Kindern, Die
Kinderfehler 9:21-5. See also
Pfister, O. (1922) Die Liebe des Kindes
und ihre Fehlentwicklungen: Ein Buch für Eltern und Berufserzieher. Bern:
Bircher; Pfister, O. (1925) Die Liebe vor
der Ehe und Ihre Fehlentwicklungen. Bern:, p204-7; Wolffheim, N. (1958) Wie
Kinder wirklich sind: Erlebtes aus einem Kindergarten, Prax Kinderpsychol & Kinderpsychia 7:16-23; Wolffheim, N.
(1966) Kinderlieben, in Psychoanalyse im
Kindergarten. München [etc.]: G.
Biermann, p124-33. Reprinted in Kentler, H. (Ed.) Texte zur Sozio-Sexualität. [Opladen]: Leske, p80-6 [56]
"Of course there is much promiscuous catching, and the game [chasing and
clutching] is satisfying other instincts than of love, for instance the
instinct of pursuing and catching […]" (p341). [57]
Adler, A. (1911) Erotische Kinderspiele, Anthropophyteia
8:256-8. They include Father-and-Mother, "Pfänderspielen", Menagerie-Spiel,
Kühemelken (Cow Milking), Robinson-Spiel, Feuerwehr-Spiel (Fire-Figher), Kot-
und Urinspiele, and Wett-Spiele (Contest; "Wer höher urinieren, schneller
masturbieren kann"). [58]
Opie, I. & Opie, P. (1959 [1967]) The
Lore & Language of Schoolchildren. Oxford: At the Clarendon Press. 1967
paperback, p328-9 [59]
Moll, A. (1897-8) Untersuchungen über die
Libido Sexualis. Berlin: Fischer; Moll,
A. (1908) Das Sexualleben des Kindes.
Leipzig: Vogel [60]
More than one hundred articles of Money discuss this point. [61]
Money, J., Cawte, J. E., Bianchi, G. N. & Nurcombe, B. (1970) Sex training
and traditions in Arnhem Land, Br J Med Psychol
47:383-99 [62] Hartley, R. E. & Goldenson, R. M.
(1957) The Complete Book of Children's
Play. New York: Th. Y. Crowell. Comp. [63]
Bloch, I. (1902) Beiträge zur Ätiologie
der Psychopathia Sexualis. Vol. II. Dresden: Dohrn [64]
Crawley, A. E. (1929) Studies of Savages
and Sex. London: Methuen & Co. [65] Guyon, R. (1929) La
Légitimé des Actes Sexuels. Saint-Denis: Dardaillon, see p39-86. He noted
that "[s]elon beaucoup de voyageurs, dans les pays chauds, à Madagascar, sur
les rives de la Plata, en Afrique, etc…, les relations sexuelles commencent
entre enfants à l'âge de 6 à 7 ans". [66]
Ploß, H. H. & Bartels, M. ([1913]) Das
Weib in der Natur- und Völkerkunde, Vol. 1. 10th rev. ed. Leipzig: Th.
Grieben. Dutch transl., 1918 [67] Ploß, H. H. ([1912]) Das Kind in Brauch und Sitte der Völker,
Vol. 2. 3rd rev. ed. by Ph. B. Renz. Leipzig: Th. Grieben [68]
Karsch-Haack, F. (1911) Das
Gleichgeschlechtliche Leben der Naturvölker. München: E. Reinhardt [69]
Buch, M. (1882) Die Wötjaken, eine
Ethnologische Studie. Stuttgart: Helsingfors [70]
Hammond, W. N. (1888) Sexual Impotence. 1889
German transl., Sexueller Impotenz beim
Männlichen und Weiblichen Geschlechtes. Berlin, p65 [71] Forel, Au. ([1904-1923]) Die Sexuelle Frage. München: Reinhardt. Cf. Bauer, B. A.
(1923) Wie bist du, Weib? Betrachtungen
über Körper, Seele, Sexualleben und Erotik des Weibes. Mit einem Anhange: Die
Prostitution. Vienna, Leipzig , München: Rikola [72]
Das Kind, 3rd rev. ed., 1912. Vol. II,
p519-59. In Femina Libido Sexualis,
edited and arranged in 1965, the issue of "infantile sexuality" (p256-9)
follows, as the phrase suggests, Freudian theory, but the book does not address
cross-cultural perspectives. [73]
Buschan, G. ([1921]), in Moll, A. (Ed.) Handbuch
der Sexualwissenschaften. 2nd ed. Leipzig: Vogel; Buschan, G. (1927) Im Anfang War das Weib. Vol. II.
Dresden: Petzschke & Gretschel [74]
Reitzenstein, F. E. von (1931) Das Weib
bei den Naturvölkern. 2nd enlarged ed. Berlin : Neufeld & Henius [75]
Kinsey, A. C., Pomeroy, W. B., Martin, C. E. & Gebhard, P. H. (1953) Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.
Philadelphia: Saunders [76] Erikson, E. ([1962]) Childhood and Society. 2nd, rev. &
enl. ed. New York: W. W. Norton & Co. [77]
Tessmann, G. (1911) Die Kinderspiele der Pangwe, Bässler-Archiv 2:250-80 [78]
Tessmann, G. (1913) Die Pangwe: Völkerkundliche
Monographie eines West Afrikanischen Negerstammes. Berlin: E Wasmuth [79]
Tessmann, G. (1921) Die Homosexualität bei den Negern Kameruns, Jahrb f Sex Zwischenst 21:121-38.
Reprinted and translated by Bradley Rose, in Murray, S. O. & Roscoe, W.
(Eds., 1998) Boy-Wives and Female
Husbands. Studies on African Homosexualities. New York: St. Martin's Press,
p149-61. See also ibid., p141-2 [80]
Tessmann, G. (1934a) Die Bafia und die
Kultur der Mittelkamerun-Bantu. Stuttgart: Strecker & Schröder [81]
Tessmann, G. (1928) Die Mbaka-Limba, Mbum und Lakka, Zeitschr Ethnol 60,4:305-52 [82]
Tessmann, G. (1934b/1937) Die Baja: Ein
Negerstamm im Mittleren Sudan: Materielle und Seelische Kultur. Stuttgart:
Strecker & Schröder. 2 vols. [83]
An abbreviated version of preparatory review efforts is included as Appendix I. [84]
See Appendix III [85]
For a Dutch response to Guyon, see Emde-Boas, C. van (1948) The child and
sexual activity [letter], Int J
Sexol 2,2:126-8 / Emde-Boas, C. van (1957) De opvattingen omtrent
kinderlijke seksualiteit van dr. R. Guyon, Inzichten [Holland] 1:222-6 [86]
Levine , A. J. (1994) 'Errorgenous' Zones?
Kinsey's Sexual Ideology, The World &
I Online, 9, p426 [87]
O'Carroll,
T. (1982) Paedophilia, The Radical Case. Boston: Alyson Publications [88]
Peterson, B. (1992) The sexual child, in "Trobriands" Collective of Authors
(Ed.) Crime Without Victims. Amsterdam: Global Academic Publ.
[Translated by E. Brongersma], p53-67 [89]
The
Dutch Periodical Paidika: The Journal of Paedophilia (1987-1995), as
well as the rare New York two-issue International Journal of Greek Love
(1965-6) contained various ethnographic studies under the common denominator of
"Greek love" / "paedophilia"; other journals which have done so include the Journal
of Homosexuality. |