性行为的基本类型

术语“阴茎口交（fellatio，自拉丁语fellare：吸、吮）用来描述男性性器官的舔吮和吮吸。显然，当两名男性发生性交时，他们很可能会相互轮流进行阴茎口交。自然而然，两个男人也能够进行同步相互的口交（见后叙的男性“69”式口交）。

在过去，一些人对阴茎口交试图区分出“主动”与“被动”性伴，因此，在他们的脑袋瓜里，就改变了这个术语的含义了。按照这种奇异的区分，尽管这名男性阴茎口交者忙于口交动作，他却扮演一位“被动者”，即扮演女性的角色；然而，这名正被人进行阴茎口交的男性，尽管他有意不活动和不做出口交动作，仍作为“主动者”保持着他真正的男人角色。这种推理的思路然后会导致奇异的主张，那就是仅仅忙于口交动作的“被动”性伴才是一名同性恋者，而不做动作的“主动”性伴莫名其妙地保持他的异性恋状态。[在这同一种论点的另一个版本里，阴茎口交的接纳者（即在这种情形下，接受阴茎口交的男人）在定义上任何时候总是扮演着女性的角色，而阴茎口交的插入者（即在这种情形下，把阴茎插入接纳者口中的男人）的性别角色始终是男性角色。毋庸赘述，这名“女性角色”然后被定义为同性恋者，而这名“男性角色”被定义为异性恋者。]

许多受内疚折磨的双性恋男人和妓男曾用这种歪曲的逻辑使他们自己的同性性活动合理化。这当然一点也不令人感到惊讶。他们坚守着不做动作和不活跃的“被动”角色，避免任何自主的动作，并设法尽量显得冷酷与高傲。然后，他们宣称他们并没有真正在做任何“酷儿”[1]。实际上，主动状态和被动状态既与生物性别无关，也与社会性别无关，还与性倾向无关。从性生理角度上看，能够被男人带到性高潮的任何人都对这个男人会产生充分的性反应，任何唇枪舌剑式的诡辩术都不能掩盖这一事实。

3. Homosexual Intercourse: Oral Intercourse

Males: Fellatio

The term "fellatio" (lat. fellare: to suck) is used to describe the licking or sucking of the male sex organs. Obviously, when two males have sexual intercourse, they may very well take turns fellating each other. Naturally, two men can also engage in simultaneous mutual oral intercourse (see "69" below).
In the past, some people tried to distinguish between "active" and "passive" partners in fellatio, thereby turning the meaning of these words on their head. According to this curious distinction, the male fellator, in spite of his busy movements, played a “passive”, female role, while the male who was being fellated, in spite of his studied inactivity and immobility, remained true to his role as an “active” male. This line of reasoning then led to the bizarre claim that only the busily moving “passive” partner was a homosexual, while the immobile “active” partner somehow preserved his heterosexuality. (In another version of the same argument, a receptor [i.e., in this case the man receiving the penis in his mouth] is, by definition, always playing a female role, while the role of an inserter [i.e., the man inserting his penis] is always male. Without any further explanation, the "female role" is then again defined as homosexual, the "male role" as heterosexual.)
Not surprisingly, many guilt-ridden ambisexual men and male prostitutes used this kind of contorted logic to rationalize their own homosexual activity. They insisted on their immobile, inactive "active" role, avoided any movement of their own, and tried to appear as cold and aloof as possible. They then claimed that they were not really doing anything "queer". Actually, activity and passivity have nothing to do with either biological sex, or gender, or sexual orientation. Anybody who can be brought to orgasm by a man is sexually fully responsive to him, and no amount of sophistry can explain this fact away.