性行為的基本類型

術語“陰莖口交（fellatio，自拉丁語fellare：吸、吮）”用來描述男性性器官的舔吮和吮吸。顯然，當兩名男性發生性交時，他們很可能會相互輪流進行陰莖口交。自然而然，兩個男人也能夠進行同步相互的口交（見後敘的男性“69”式口交）。

在過去，一些人對陰莖口交試圖區分出“主動”與“被動”性伴，因此，在他們的腦袋瓜裏，就改變了這個術語的含義了。按照這種奇異的區分，儘管這名男性陰莖口交者忙於口交動作，他卻扮演一位“被動者”，即扮演女性的角色；然而，這名正被人進行陰莖口交的男性，儘管他有意不活動和不做出口交動作，仍作為“主動者”保持著他真正的男人角色。這種推理的思路然後會導致奇異的主張，那就是僅僅忙於口交動作的“被動”性伴才是一名同性戀者，而不做動作的“主動”性伴莫名其妙地保持他的異性戀狀態。[在這同一種論點的另一個版本裏，陰莖口交的接納者（即在這種情形下，接受陰莖口交的男人）在定義上任何時候總是扮演著女性的角色，而陰莖口交的插入者（即在這種情形下，把陰莖插入接納者口中的男人）的性別角色始終是男性角色。毋庸贅述，這名“女性角色”然後被定義為同性戀者，而這名“男性角色”被定義為異性戀者。]

許多受內疚折磨的雙性戀男人和妓男曾用這種歪曲的邏輯使他們自己的同性性活動合理化。這當然一點也不令人感到驚訝。他們堅守著不做動作和不活躍的“被動”角色，避免任何自主的動作，並設法儘量顯得冷酷與高傲。然後，他們宣稱他們並沒有真正在做任何“酷兒（queer）”[1]。實際上，主動狀態和被動狀態既與生物性別無關，也與社會性別無關，還與性傾向無關。從性生理角度上看，能夠被男人帶到性高潮的任何人都對這個男人會產生充分的性反應，任何唇槍舌劍式的詭辯術都不能掩蓋這一事實。

3. Homosexual Intercourse: Oral Intercourse

Males: Fellatio

The term "fellatio" (lat. fellare: to suck) is used to describe the licking or sucking of the male sex organs. Obviously, when two males have sexual intercourse, they may very well take turns fellating each other. Naturally, two men can also engage in simultaneous mutual oral intercourse (see "69" below).
In the past, some people tried to distinguish between "active" and "passive" partners in fellatio, thereby turning the meaning of these words on their head. According to this curious distinction, the male fellator, in spite of his busy movements, played a “passive”, female role, while the male who was being fellated, in spite of his studied inactivity and immobility, remained true to his role as an “active” male. This line of reasoning then led to the bizarre claim that only the busily moving “passive” partner was a homosexual, while the immobile “active” partner somehow preserved his heterosexuality. (In another version of the same argument, a receptor [i.e., in this case the man receiving the penis in his mouth] is, by definition, always playing a female role, while the role of an inserter [i.e., the man inserting his penis] is always male. Without any further explanation, the "female role" is then again defined as homosexual, the "male role" as heterosexual.)
Not surprisingly, many guilt-ridden ambisexual men and male prostitutes used this kind of contorted logic to rationalize their own homosexual activity. They insisted on their immobile, inactive "active" role, avoided any movement of their own, and tried to appear as cold and aloof as possible. They then claimed that they were not really doing anything "queer". Actually, activity and passivity have nothing to do with either biological sex, or gender, or sexual orientation. Anybody who can be brought to orgasm by a man is sexually fully responsive to him, and no amount of sophistry can explain this fact away.