The Sexual
Curriculum (Oct.,
2002) [to
Volume II Index] [to
Main Index Page] Janssen,
D. F. (Oct., 2002). Growing Up Sexually. Volume II: The Sexual
Curriculum: The Manufacture and Performance of Pre-Adult Sexualities.
Interim Report. Amsterdam, The Netherlands Historical
Background of Project "Growing Up Sexually"
[see also Guidelines to Atlas Volume] Contents [up]
Historical
Background of the Project "Growing Up Sexually" 0.1 Scheduling, Expert Participation 0.2 Research Proposal to Final Drafts: Dimensional Evolutions 0.7 Perspectives: Problematic, Arbitrary and Unsolved "Dichotomies"
and Operational Choices 0.8.1
Limitations inherent to the Project 0.8.2
Limitations inherent to the Materials This
short comment on the historical background of the project identifies the
gradual broadening of covered topics, together with the gradual narrowing of
presentation formats involved in the processing of review data. 0.1 Scheduling, Expert
Participation [up] [Contents]
Originally
scheduled January to May 2002, the study was extended till September that year,
predominantly due to interim reformulations and expansions of the original
format of the study (vide infra).
Monthly scheduled colloquia were attended by Mr. Humphrey E. Lamur, Professor
of Social Anthropology at the University of Amsterdam, Mr. Cees J. Straver,
PhD., LLM. and financial secretary of the Dr. Edward Brongersma Foundation, Mr.
Peter Th. M. J. van Eeten, MA, and author Mr. Diederik F. Janssen, MD. At these
interim colloquia, the following subjects were discussed: --
formulation and reformulation of project objectives; --
discussion of methodological and theoretical perspectives; --
subject depth, priority and direction (chapter contents, etc.); --
presentation; --
lateral activities. 0.2 Research Proposal to Final
Drafts: Dimensional Evolutions [up] [Contents]
A
first proposal delivered to the Dr. Mr. E. Brongersma Foundation (dated November
2001) entitled "Paradoxia among the
Primitives: An Atlas of Play Sexuality" was primarily concerned with
extending theoretical and ideological perspectives as addressed in author's
previous surveying of historical material ("Paradoxia Sexualis") to the
anthropological record. It was to map occurrence and features of childhood
sexual behaviour over the ethnographic span. It was this entry that had been
the subject of a limited private pilot study presented in preliminary contacts.
As
was established later, a previous effort by Gwen Broude (middle 1970s, Harvard
University) resulted in a qualitative paper record ("we are talking here about
thousands of pages of notes")[1]
of ethnographic research including links to quite similar topics, but only the
numeric measures of "sexual restraint" were used in subsequent publications. The
definitive research proposal dated December 12th 2001 entitled "A Historio-Ethnographic Atlas of Erotic
Socialisation" was to be concerned with "[…] an extensive literature review of
sexual behaviour development and sexual behaviour socialization in childhood
within an ethnographic paradigm [aiming] at the identification of vertical and
lateral systems associated with the area of human erotic expressions at the
descriptive level, [covering] as many cultural and subcultural settings as are
available in anthropological writing". In
January 2002 it was agreed to proceed along this line with, among minor issues,
the following sensible refinements: --
extension of the examined life course period to the full length of the preadult
life span, "adult" not clearly being defined; --
presentation, where possible, of a "child's perspective" approach rather than a
socialiser's perspective. A
presentation of data collateral to the Atlas
commodity was gradually developed within an expanding list of subjects that
would clarify socialisation processes; these chapters would have to be united
in a "Subject Volume". It was agreed upon that the study would have to uncover
historio-/ethno-/geographic patterning of sexual life spans as inspired by
cultural tendencies to "curricularise" individual trajectories. It was
hypothesised that such processes of shaping hypothetical "trajectories" toward
established, culturally sanctioned "curricula" could be identified within
either pedagogical or sexological contexts (curricula). Consequently, the study
was renamed to "Growing Up Sexually: An Ethnohistorical Atlas on Erotic
Curricula and Curricularisation". At this stage, theoretical formats were
left undetermined. Further, the integration of accumulated historical
Occidental (as opposed to non-Occidental) material was declared of secondary
importance. A preliminary
"Subject Volume" covered some 225 pages of data organised within a number of
chapters. It was concluded that some of the chapters, unless theoretically
positioned and solidified, could not contribute substantially to a
cross-cultural discussion of "curricularisation". It was further established
that presentation of data should mainly concern itself with a teleological
format, thus identifying cultural motivations for socialisation on the basis of
ensuring future or contemporary social structure and functioning. Thus, a
tentative second, more comprehensive volume was generated using a selection of
previously collected data, and augmented with sociological material mainly
covering non-ethnographic sources. This final volume was titled "Sexual Behaviour Curricula: An
Anthropological Attempt. Capita Selecta from an Ethno-Historical Survey". By this time a
cursory survey of academic traditions in describing sexual socialisation
processes had established the preference for a contemporary constructionist
format (see §1.4 for a
legitimisation). This went along a redefinition of the project's main features
as providing an anthropological elaboration of sociological models, which could
not have been elaborated without such (specifically developmental)
anthropologia (cf. Becker), and the establishment of a relativist background
for existing models which appear to have been created without much
(specifically, developmental) anthropologia (Gagnon). This interim
shift of perspective resulted in earlier elaborations (latency, shame, arranged
marriage, biocultural perspectives) not being further pursued for the time
being. Concluding, the project
evolved from an ethnographic atlas to a rearrangement of sociological
positions, and from a perspective on "controlled", "managed", or "curricularised"
sexual behaviour "development" to one on "construed" and "operationalised"
sexual identity and orientation performances. Its object evolved from culture
to (acculturised) persona. A final main cause was to incorporate ethnographic
materials in a tentative, interactionist, and performance-based format. As a result, a
literature review of cross-cultural materials that in earlier phases had been
considered central was finally incorporated as an Appendix (Appendix
I). This is not to say that the materials reviewed here were
considered of less relevance; rather, they were situated as contributing to the
macrostructural ramification of microcontextual performances that may or may
not show similarities over this structural range. The
study thus offers a bird's eye view of theoretical positioning, centralising
constructionist perspectives. The final mode of organising data was informed by
the following antiparallel (and to some extent circular) processes: --
extracting ethnohistorical material for accommodation in sociological
frameworks; --
identifying frameworks for accommodating ethnohistorical material. As
discussed previously, the accent was placed on the former mode in early stages,
and on the latter in later stages, a debatable order. 0.2.1 Webpublication and Continuity [up] [Contents]
In
a late stages of the project, Prof. Dr. R. T. Francoeur and Prof. Dr. E. J.
Haeberle were contacted with regard to the possibilities of web-publication via
Humboldt University, Berlin, associated with the Magnus Hirschfeld Archive
for Sexology (http://www.sexarchive.info). The benefits are the following: --
the convenient distribution and retrieval format of accumulated review data,
including to individuals not privileged to use academic resources; --
the opportunity for appeal to academic expertise and participation in periodic
online additions. This pertains to reference expansion, revision, and further
processing; --
the stimulation of further research, interpretation, and elaboration efforts. --
the inclusion of a Contributor's facility,
to support a resource-based colloquium. 0.3 Final Research Purpose [up] [Contents]
With
both casuistic and theoretical materials, I would like to identify basic entries
to preadult sexualities as sensitive to ethnographic variation: as
"developing", as "learned", as "natural", and as "problematic" categories. In
tune with the chosen theoretical work-up, I have centralised children's
narratives, though rare, and native accounts, though fragmentary. A collateral
interest was to some extent positioned as providing a baseline for the
project's theoretical agenda: the sexological situating of the "child" as
developmental, as protosocial (e.g., protofunctional) and as prenormative.
Author's preliminary surveying specifically issued the following topics as
sexological explananda: --
pre-institutional performance; --
the social construction and use of curricula, discontinuity and autobiography; --
the interplay of biological and developmentalist (pedagogic) concepts of
"development"; --
the concepts of behavioural competence, praxis and the mediation of the
operative. 0.4 Legitimisation [up] [Contents]
We may argue with Fine (1986)[2]
that "[…] it may be best for adults not to know what their offspring are
doing". However, it
should be clear that an ethnographic inventory approach is required for any
design of human erotogenesis that does not wish to limit its scope to any given
cultural setting. Literature reviewing by the author has revealed a number of
voids in the literature on erotic development, and a number of seemingly
idiosyncratic choices in curriculum and narrative that might help explain these
voids. One void is the relative neglect of the early indefinite and
preinstitutional "precursors" of the mental experience of eroticism, as
compared to behavioural phenomena. This is particularly true of ethnographic
writings. To argue that mental processes are decidedly and distinctly
behavioural, which the current work tends to do, of course does not compensate
for this methodologically mediated vacuum. The
relevance of a broad understanding of the erotogenetic process has become more
urgent given a number of comparatively recent developments in moral and social
change. This is potentially significant in issues regarding the electronic
globalisation of sexual information availability and its impact on
socialisation; the legislative and "moral outreach" of sexual abuse ideologies
on an international scale; and the concurrent centralising of phase defined
"psychopathologies" in the realm of sexuality, for a large part of the life
course. The "cultural factor" in any of these modern motives can not be
regarded as peripheral in any substantial sense. Therefore, a comprehensive
review of ethnographic observations on ideas, practices and events in the
sphere of the erotic paradigm of life will contribute to an understanding of
local sexual organisations to which all such concepts are, in a way, relative.
As Irvine (1994:p24)[3]
remarked, "social history and cultural analysis are important tools to
challenge the biomedical model that privileges individual behavior". Secondly, ethnohistorical comparison of sexual
development methods would provide preliminary clues to the evolution of human
sexual cultures from the "ontogenetic" point of view. Other (lateral) interests
include the issue of sexual education (e.g., Irvine, 1995)[4],
especially within biomedical agendas. 0.5 Definitions [up] [Contents]
Generally,
theoretical delineation on "erotic" development, even within a narrow cultural
setting, seldom entails more than a suggestion for perspective. Further
reviewing of this point appears to be in operation[5]. The
formation of the narrative and experience of gender and of the erotic aura of
existence takes place within a complex set of agenda, reverberating between a
variety of multi-stage neuroendocrinological processes, and a multidimensional
landscape of sociocultural attitudes. Limiting the formative perspective of
human "sexual behaviour" to an economy of environmental claims and a more or
less stereotyped curriculum of expressive tendencies has proved to be a
commonly utilised technique in classic anthropological approaches to
socialisation in general, at least by most of the surveyed literature. The
"sexual sphere" included in ethnographic study is limited, by compromise, to the
potential set of behavioural phenomena that are natively and / or auctorially
(by the ethnographer or ethnologist) included in the field of human eroticism.
The environment of this "sphere" is defined by the collective of mechanisms
that are natively or auctorially presumed to be of relevance to its
actualisation or censorship. At this time, biological factors are best thought
of in terms of representation, since the issue of biological agency is not
adequately studied. Since
the closely interrelated matters of definition and perspective are to be
regarded as crucial in any discourse on human erotic curricula, it is suggested
that a survey, including two sets of
definitions, might contribute to an informed, "meta-auctorial" insight on the
anthropology of "sexual socialisation", within a potentially complex system of
"observation" and interpretation. This meta-auctorial (reviewer) level was
progressively introduced to address omissions. 0.6 Methodology [up] [Contents]
All literature relevant to the field delineated above
is used to provide a survey that aims at both geographic and historic
versatility. Literature is tracked through cross-references. Paper HRAF references
are tracked via category 864. Several websites were used[6].
The eHRAF is searched and quoted via category 864, and through additional
basic, Boolean and proximity searches. Data and references are drawn from
various medical, sociological and psychological electronic databases, including
Medline, Psychinfo, Sociological Abstracts, Historical Abstracts,
Anthropological Index Online (AIO), etc. The 125 page Focused Ethnographic Bibliography for the Standard Cross-Cultural
Sample[7],
offering pre-coded variables including childhood training (4th
digit), was used as a starting bibliography. Another starting source, The Dutch
Central Catalogue (NCC), was searched, for instance through GOO code 73.44
(Cultural Anthropology, Sexuality) in combination with additional codes.
Anthropological, sociological and other sources were searched fulltext using
JSTOR® (which allows basic, Boolean and proximity searches). Beside digital
searches, introductory data gathering has been effectuated using a "shelf
approach" in selected sections of university-affiliated anthropological
libraries[8]
and other specialized anthropological libraries[9]. Special credits
go to a number of Dutch sexological collections and libraries[10]. A number of references
to countries in the fourth volume of Francoeur's International Encyclopaedia are not included due to their
unavailability in digital form at the time of writing[11].
Fulltext articles were obtained
through many search engines, including JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org), EBSCO Host Research
Databases (http://www.ebscohost.com/), the MUSE Project (http://muse.jhu.edu/search/search.pl), PCI Full Text
(http://pcift.chadwyck.co.uk), Sciencedirect (http://www.sciencedirect.com, including the use of "alert" functions during
the project), Findarticles (http://www.findarticles.com/PI/index.jhtml), Google (http://www.google.nl), Education-Line (http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/). Selected books were obtained via Blueribbon
Books Reborn (http://blueribbon.books-reborn.org). A number of authors provided drafts of papers. 0.7 Perspectives: Problematic, Arbitrary and
Unsolved "Dichotomies" and Operational Choices [up] [Contents]
The
Atlas is primarily concerned with listing and reflecting on sources describing
historical and ethnographic sexualities as activities. A range of problems were
encountered in the process of using these data to fit within existing models.
Looking back on preliminarily utilised presentations and elaborations, the
following "dichotomies" were identified (followed by a brief comment): --
Cultural opposition vs. cultural
uniformism. It
was agreed upon on the outset that the project should commit itself to securing
cross-"cultural" relativism by means of mapping cultural diversity through
cultural contradistinction (juxtaposition). However, it was agreed that this
would not have to require a uniform bicultural or tricultural format. It was
also argued that the data render the anthropologist and reviewer susceptible
for essentialist visions on "cultures" as orientations fixed in time and place
rather than as evolving, complex, variable and potential life-ways. --
Preadult "sexuality" as a behavioural
vs. psychological substrate. The
project in its latter stages was more or less redirected from a survey of
behavioural phenomena to psychological, psychometric and social constructs.
This ultimately was frustrated by the lack of unifying sociological theories as
well as quality (ethnographic and cross-cultural) data. Thus, these issues
(particularly love/romanticism, eroticism, "eroticisation") were covered in
full for the European / U.S. data available, augmented with only a limited,
tentative selection of observations from the ethnographic record. The author
regrets this limitation, which in part is due to the author's prior being
unacquainted with sociological traditions. --
"Ethnographic" vs. non-ethnographic
study of pre-adult sexuality. It
was observed that the extent of sociological study of children's sexuality was
surprisingly modest. However, a certain amount of data could be collected for
the work on gender/sexuality within "school" environments. While the author was
well acquainted with most non-ethnographic material on preadolescent
sexualities, integrating these data with newly generated bibliographies was
primarily left to future efforts. --
Historiographic vs. ethnographic data in
constructionist theories. The author personally feels that an
interactionist / constructionist perspective on "sexual" behaviour and identity
development can and should be informed by a mixture of cross-historical and
cross-ethnical comparisons. Both entries have been surveyed in this project,
though not in a format that separates one approach from the other; any
separation, furthermore, would be a spurious one. I would argue that the
current (ongoing) collection of references accounts for a rather complete
survey of both entries. --
"Biological" vs. cultural
determination/representation. The choice of an
interactionist/constructionist interpretation of data, together with the stress
on the presentation and collection of constructionist data, does not oppose
images of biological representation, and also does not reject the image of
biological determination. Speaking with Prof. Dr. John Money and referring to
the wealth of biosocial entries to the problem, any polarised perspective is an
undue simplification; on the other hand, the inability to generate data needed
to isolate such polarity necessitates (or perhaps grants) unilateral
perspectives. An early preliminary chapter addressing biological agency in the
determination of sexarche in cross-cultural studies was not further elaborated.
[For a short resulting bibliography, see here] --
Academic vs lay native sexologies. Cultures vary in their utilisation of
sets of rationales to explain the social interactions involved in sexual
behaviour and identity socialisation as necessitated by various grounds
(developmental sexologies). The European case (chapter 2) provides an understanding
of how these sexologies vary over time as well. As was detailed in a tentative
chapter not included in the final draft, it was hypothesised that the dogmata
and issues addressed within such sexologies may be explained by specific
ethnohistorical contexts. Extracting "developmental sexologies" from
ethnographic sources proved a disappointing task, primarily given the general
lack interest and methodological rigour. 0.8 Selected Limitations [up] [Contents]
0.8.1 Limitations inherent to the Project [up] [Contents] The
quality and detail of this review is compromised by a number of problems,
including: (1)
author's previous inexpertise with the social anthropological discipline; (2)
the often problematic (or even absent) indexing of monographs; (3)
the frequently encountered unavailability of sources within national libraries; (4)
the constructive "forward" approach which includes the gradual expansion of
subjects and perspectives, and the consequential "missed references". (5)
the purposeful initial ignoring of operational limitations, whether
ideological, pragmatic or theoretical. Inherently, the work does not generate
hypothetical formulations, and cannot claim to address, statistically or
otherwise, the manifold hypotheses it reviews or refrains from reviewing (in
preliminary or final essays). 0.8.2 Limitations inherent to the Materials [up] [Contents] In
reference to the observations presented in Appendix II, it can be concluded that few
materials address non-western developmental sexologies, and very few do so to a
satisfactory degree. More dramatically, non-western materials, especially those
older than the 1980s, do not commonly address children's views and narratives.
This rendered most non-western material impotent within the (final) theoretical
scope of the thematic part of this project. 0.8.3 Statistics [up] [Contents] The selected, lateral inclusions of quantitative
materials are primarily derived from the author's preparatory literature
reviewing, and, strictly, did not follow from the current project's objectives.
The use of quantitative methods using the presently identified materials is
limited, predominantly due to the methodological format in which they were
gathered. Work using SCCS data in SPSS format awaits further processing, and
shall be initiated outside the contours of the current project. 0.9 Final
Product [up] [Contents]
Given the limitations identified above, cited
references were not as a rule cross-examined, analyzed within a geo- or
chronological setting, or, as a routine, challenged with theoretical data. As a
result, the survey takes on a global bibliographic character, primarily
occupied with the identification of relevant literature pertaining to (i)
qualitative and descriptive materials, and (ii) methodological entries. If presented
the opportunity, priorities were given to (a) data covering earlier rather than
later life phases; (b) non-Western rather than Western data; (c) qualitative
rather than quantitative materials; (d) cross-cultural rather than monocultural
materials; (e) historical rather than contemporary data; (f) precolonial rather
than colonial or postcolonial data; (g) constructionist / interactionst rather
than alternative perspectives. 0.10 Personal Note [up] [Contents]
Personally,
the author feels to have gained qualitative insights in the framework of social
sciences previously outside his reach. The author, however, regrets his
limitations in maximising the potential applicability of a number of the
surveyed principles and theoretical positions. Further, it is regrettable that
no further academic affiliation could be added to the said colloquia.
Therefore, the project remains at a preacademic level as is concerned synthetic
elaboration. Much
more data were collected than are presented in the current volumes. For
additional references, the reader is referred to interim bibliographies, which
will be updated continuously. The
author personally feels that the curricularisation of social pleasure is a by-product of the cultural
logic of anticipating separation and bonding transitions. The cross-cultural
study of pleasure potential socialisation (e.g., Klein, 1972)[12]
therefore would provide a wider scope for the study of the developing erotic
experience. As for a personal (medical) agenda, the ethnographic record does
not as yet solve elementary problems in approaching the process of
erotogenetics. I agree with Prof. John Money that this is evidently a cultural
hesitation localisable in post-industrial currents; there is, however, a
universal touch to it. Future researchers might want to try disproving the
hypothesis that the issue is essentially unresearchable at the discursive
level, and that the many compromised methodologies historically offer more
outlooks, less insights. A non-affirmative answer does not make the field a
less interesting or less central one, of course. Notes [up] [Contents]
[last updated 011202] [1]
Personal communication, May 2nd, 2002 [2] Fine, G. A. (1986) The dirty play of little boys, Society, Nov/Dec:63-7 [3]
Irvine, J. M. (1994) Cultural differences and adolescent sexualities, in
Irvine, J. M. (Ed.) Sexual Cultures and
the Construction of Adolescent Identities. Philadelphia: Temple University
Press, p3-28 [4]
Irvine, J. M. (1995) Sexuality Education
Across Cultures. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass [5] Current research sponsored by the Dr.
Mr. E. Brongersma Foundation, Amsterdam. [6]
EHRAF (http://ets.umdl.umich.edu/e/ehrafe/;
also via http://lucy.ukc.ac.uk/EthnoAtlas/ethno.html),
JSTOR (http://www.jstor.org/), etc.
University websites; NCC via UL sites; AOI via http://www.lucy.ukc.ac.uk/AIO.html;
ASC at http://asc.leidenuniv.nl/library/catalogues.htm;
Francoeur (1997) via http://www.sexarchive.info/GESUND/ARCHIV/IES/BEGIN.HTM;
Focused Ethnographic Bibliography for the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample
found on www.worldcultures.org/~drwhite/worldcul/SCCSbib.pdf;
Medline at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi; NISSO at http://www.nisso.nl/ndbnl.htm; Homodok Library at http://www.homodok.nl/ [7]
Taken from D. R. White, in World Cultures
2,1. Version prepared by William Divale, 2000. [8]
Particularly those in Amsterdam (UBA), Utrecht (UBU), and Nijmegen (UBN). [9]
These include Africa Studies Center
(Leiden); Royal Institute of Linguistics
and Anthropology (Leiden); Dutch Institute for Near East Studies (NINO,
Leiden) [10] These include the Dr. Mr. E. Brongersma Collection
(Brongersma Foundation, Amsterdam), Dr. C. van Emde-Boas Collection (University
of Amsterdam), Homodoc Library (Amsterdam) and the NISSO library (Dutch
Institute for Socio-Sexological Research, Utrecht). The author regrets denied
access to Dr. F. Bernard's collection (Bernard Foundation, Rotterdam). [11] Austria, Colombia, Croatia, Egypt, Iceland,
Indonesia, Outer Space, Papua New Guinea, The Philippines, Portugal, Turkey, and
Vietnam. [12] Klein, G. S. (1972) The vital pleasures, in Holt, R.
R. & Freund, P. et al. (Eds.) Psychoanalysis
and Contemporary Science. New York: Macmillan, p181-205 |