|
Critical Introduction
- Old Silent Assumptions |
|
2. The Myth of Therapeutic Impartiality
|
|
Individual fulfillment and social
restraint As with the belief in a
"natural sexuality," the second great
silent assumption also cannot stand up
to rational scrutiny. The belief in
therapeutic impartiality is simply
another self-serving delusion.
After all, if society really had an
interest in individual sexual
fulfillment, the dysfunctions would be
far less common than they are today,
and they would all be traceable to
particular individual conditions and
circumstances. However, in our society
this is not the case. The very fact that
so many people need sex therapy points
to a larger social problem. Indeed,
serious therapists sooner or later find
themselves in conflict with certain
prevailing sexual values. After all,
their professional goal is to free their
clients from their inhibitions, and, in
most cases, these inhibitions are due to
negative social influences. Good sex
therapy, therefore, leads to the
client’s sexual emancipation and
self-determination. By the same token,
those who merely help an individual
conform to society are not engaged in
true therapy but in adjustment training.
However, it is this function of sex
therapists as unwitting agents of social
control which disturbs some
libertarians. They deplore the
frequently naive approaches of
therapists and ridicule their efforts as
repressive interventions or simply as
"sex by prescription". While this
criticism is exaggerated, its basic
thrust should be kept well in mind by
all sex therapists. Their first duty is
always to their clients.
|